Radar Perene / Articles / article

Ânima × Perene Risk: eighty points between capital and mood

Article

When they break apart

Two of the house's indices measure what the eye tends to confuse for a single thing: Perene Risk tracks where capital moves inside the market; Ânima tracks how the investor feels. Almost always they move together. In June 2018 they did not — and the gap between them was wide enough to become the story of the month. Risk appetite recomposed itself in a single leap, jumping from retreat to the extreme of risk_on, while mood barely budged from the bottom of the scale. In numbers: Perene Risk from 14.6 to 93.6, Ânima from 11.2 to 13.2 — more than eighty points separating what the money was doing from what the investor was feeling. The intermarket crossing endorsed the capital, from 45.42 to 74.21; the backdrop of the dollar at R$3.7732 helps explain why confidence lagged behind.

When they converge

March 2020 showed the opposite. Domestic fear stopped being mere mood and turned into liquidation, and for the first time in months both gauges marked the same temperature. In numbers: Ânima scraped the floor, from 4.1 to 2.6, and Perene Risk, still glued to the ground, went from 0.0 to 10.6 — not as a return of appetite, but as an exit from risk. The dollar at R$4.8839 entered statistical anomaly. Capital and mood, at last, pointed the same way. Except that way was an abyss: the convergence did not seal an agreement about the rally, but about the fear.

What did not happen

In neither case did the intuitive reading survive. Agreement is not always good news, and discord is not always an alarm. In 2018, seeing capital and mood separated by eighty points looked like a sign of fragility — but it was the money leading a recomposition that sentiment did not yet have the courage to sign. In 2020, seeing the two finally together looked like a sign of clarity — but what they confirmed, in unison, was the fall. Anyone who reads the gauges meeting as comfort, and their parting as a warning, inverted both episodes.

The honest verdict

Converging or breaking apart, on its own, says nothing — direction is missing. The two indices tell different stories because they measure different realities: the mechanics of the flow and the conviction of mood. When the first runs ahead, the honest question is not which one is right, but how long the gap lasts. When the two stick together, it is to which side they stuck. The archive keeps both forms; neither is, by itself, a good omen.

Continue reading: When the gauges disagree · How long mood takes to catch up to the flow · What the Ânima Index is →

The Radar reads these regimes every day. See today's reading →

Characters: Structure (intermarket) · Flow (risk appetite) · Dollar · Cyclicals × defensives