Radar Perene / Articles / marquee

October 2017: mood nailed 69.2 while the structure collapsed to 8.2

Marquee

The extreme

Confidence looked unshakeable. For the first time in months, domestic optimism found no counterweight — and it was precisely when it sang loudest that capital, without fanfare, began to pull its chips off the table. The gap had the shape of an irony: the audience gave a standing ovation to a tune the musicians themselves had already stopped playing.

In numbers: the Ânima Index — the temperature of domestic confidence — rose from 66.1 to 69.2, extreme optimism, the most enthusiastic point of the series in months. In the same month, the Perene Risk Index, which measures the structural willingness to carry risk, plunged from 56.9 to 8.2 — nearly fifty points, all the way to the floor of the scale, in declared risk_off.

The backdrop justified the enthusiasm: Selic at 7.5% a year, monthly IPCA at 0.42% and the dollar at R$ 3.1912. Falling rates and contained inflation are the classic fuel of optimism. But the intermarket — capital moving across asset classes — only eased slightly, from 62.12 to 60.44, still in moderate risk_on. Confidence was celebrating exactly what the most cautious part of the market had already begun to sell.

What happened next

The rift did not resolve through collapse. In January 2018, it was the structure that rose to meet the mood: the intermarket jumped from 28.37 to 72.14, entering strong risk_on, and Ânima nailed 75.2. The axes pointed the same way again.

The truce was short-lived. In April 2018, the mismatch reappeared, inverted. Ânima crashed from 56.0 to 28.1, deep pessimism, while the Perene Risk rose from 32.1 to 51.4 — now it was the mood that distrusted and the flow that advanced, in step with the rotation from banks into commodities. In October 2018, the Perene Risk reached 92.8 with Ânima still held at 61.1: once again capital running ahead of confidence.

What did not happen

The divergence of October 2017 ushered in no immediate tumble. The Perene Risk's risk_off did not drag the market down — three months later, it was the structure that rose to confirm the mood, and not the other way around. The dissonant note never turned into an alarm within that window.

The honest verdict

And here humility is in order. The engine itself acknowledged the limit: in April 2018, when it took stock, it found only one episode analogous to October 2017 — below the minimum of five needed for any statistical reading. With no sample, there was no verdict to put into words. The signal was rare and real; predictive, it never was.

Continue reading: the truckers of 2018 — the money before the faith → · Ânima Index → · Intermarket →

The Radar reads these regimes every day. See today's reading →

Characters: Mood · Structure (intermarket) · Flow (risk appetite) · Dollar