Radar Perene / Articles / episode

The costly thermometer moved first — November 2019's 35 points

Episode

The extreme

For three months running, mood made promises and the money never came. Optimism climbed with the headlines and the charts while invested capital stayed with its arms folded. Then the order flipped: confidence pulled back and, for the first time in the sequence, it was the money that walked toward risk. Sentiment is cheap; a position costs. When the thermometer that costs is the one that moves, the reading carries different weight. In numbers: the Perene Risk Index jumped from 11.0 to 46.4 — thirty-five points in a month, from the bottom of the risk-off back to neutral — while Ânima slipped from 54.9 to 43.6. The Selic held at 5.0% a year, the dollar closed at R$ 4.1553, and the IFIX/IBOV ratio turned from z -0.82 to +0.83.

What happened next

The re-entry was short-lived. In February 2020 mood and flow collapsed together down to the floor — Ânima from 33.2 to 4.1, the Perene Risk back to 0.0 — with the dollar leaping to R$ 4.341 and defensives becoming the only shelter. In May capital re-entered again, from 24.2 to 44.3, with the market still buying only what protects. And it took until November 2020 for the three thermometers to read the same hour: Ânima from 28.6 to 64.3, Perene Risk from zero to 58.4, intermarket at 75.06.

What did not happen

The money coming back was not insurance. Six months after that November, the episode matured at -10.5% — outside the central band then projected, between 11.2% and 17.2%, and below the 80% interval. The costly thermometer was right that the regime had changed; it did not see what lay ahead. No reading of flow saw a pandemic three months out.

The honest verdict

The engine itself stamped the call ambiguous, not correct, over only six comparable episodes — a shallow base. The signal was worth what it said: money re-entering matters more than mood retreating, because one demands a decision and the other only humor. But mattering more is not immunizing. The position that costs also errs when the future does not fit the sample.

Continue reading: Mood versus appetite · The mood returned, but the money left · Three clocks, same hour →

The Radar reads these regimes every day. See today's reading →