Radar Perene / Articles / episode

The shock of May 2017 — risk collapsed from 49 to 7, and mood chose to breathe

Episode

The extreme

Something broke beneath the market, and it was not the price. It was the bet that had been holding the year up. The cyclicals and the banks — the two faces of the thesis that the domestic cycle was running firm — handed back as a block the absurd premium the market had been paying, and the risk structure crossed over into retreat. And then the paradox: in that very month, people's mood, stuck at rock bottom for months, finally breathed. In numbers: the Perene Risk Index fell from 49.4 to 7.5, crossing into risk_off; the Cyclical/Non-Cyclical ratio, stretched to 2.43 deviations — the kind of extreme that rarely holds — eased back to 0.80; the intermarket gave way from 76.87 to 64.68; and the Ânima Index rose from 23.0 to 34.6. The Selic closed at 11.25%, the dollar at R$ 3.2095.

What happened next

Normalization did not bury the bet — it only displaced it. Three months later, in August 2017, the cyclical premium stretched again (2.19 to 2.56), and capital moved neighborhoods within the exchange itself: the IFIX/IBOV plunged from -0.54 to -2.16, and Perene risk, far from the floor, jumped from 57.1 to 77.1. In November 2017, another change of command: the financials left the table (Finance/IBOV from -0.17 to -1.87) and commodities retook the lead, with Ânima nailed at 69.2, immovable optimism. Only in May 2018 did the structure truly retreat — and through a different lever. Commodities in reais surged to the top (z from -0.11 to +1.63) on the weak currency, the dollar at R$ 3.6361, Perene risk back to 14.6 and mood sinking to 11.2.

What did not happen

May's extreme was not the end of the reflation thesis. Anyone who read the fall of the cyclical premium as "it's over" was wrong: by August it was stretched again, at 2.56. The risk_off of 7.5 likewise announced no collapse — three months later Perene risk was declaring risk_on at 77.1. And mood's breath did not turn into a firm march: it jumped to 67.9 in July and sat down. The shock did not resolve in a clean direction; it oscillated for a year before the real retreat — and that one, when it came, was the work of the currency, not of the domestic cycle the original bet had celebrated.

The honest verdict

The reading got the normalization right: the cyclical premium was extreme and it gave way. But to normalize is not to end. The bet came back, cooled, came back again, and only twelve months later did the structure give way for good — driven by the dollar, not by the cycle. An extreme that reverts can revert back.

Continue reading: The capital moves neighborhoods — August 2017 · The financials leave the table — November 2017 · When the currency dictates the harvest — May 2018 →

The Radar reads these regimes every day. See today's reading →

Characters: Structure (intermarket) · Flow (risk appetite) · Mood · Dollar