Radar Perene / Articles / episode

The stimulus that didn't thrill — the rate at its floor and the month that refused the drama (Sep/2012)

Episode

The extreme

Rarely had money been so cheap in Brazil — and rarely had a month had so little to say. The Selic sat at the bottom of a cutting cycle, the compressed real rate pushed capital out of fixed income, and the recipe for euphoria seemed fully laid out. The market yawned. In numbers: the structure's largest ratio shift was just 0.79 of a deviation — against 1.13 in June and 1.36 in August —, with the Perene Risk Index ticking up gently from 47.5 to 57.0 and the intermarket from 38.32 to 48.2, both in comfortable neutral. The little that did move was convergence: stretched safe havens deflated back toward the mean (Utilities/IBOV from 1.33 to 0.54, commodities in real terms from 1.70 to 0.95) while the financial sector gained the most ground of the month. Selic target at 7.5% a year, dollar at R$ 2.028.

What happened next

The calm was not a floor; it was a pause before the seesaw. Three months later, in December, the Perene Risk leapt from 20.6 to 78.6 — a sign that November had plunged into fear before confidence came rushing back, with Finance/IBOV advancing 1.69 of a deviation in a single month. At six months, March 2013 told a different story: money was choosing shelter, not risk, and the September episode matured into a return of −7.0%. And at twelve months, the stimulus itself was already receding — the Selic, which September had caught at its floor of 7.5%, was back to 9.0% a year.

What did not happen

Maximum stimulus lit no rally at all. Anyone who read September's truce as the start of a sustained advance got the script wrong: the next chapter was one of fear — Perene Risk at 20.6 in November —, not of celebration. Nor was the rate at its floor the floor of a long era of cheap money: within a year it was already climbing. And the serenity rewarded no one who stood still; six months on, the observed return was negative.

The honest verdict

The truce reading got the regime right — the engine classified the episode as a hit, with −7.0% over six months, within the central band of the distribution (p25–p75 of −8.8% to +13.3%). But the base was shallow: only five comparable episodes and a dispersion of 22.1, far too wide to teach much about the next time. What remains is the uncomfortable note: it was when conditions most invited risk that the market moved least — and the quiet preceded a drift of −7%, not a rally.

Continue reading: The first rate cut · The Selic as a character of the regime · The dollar as a thermometer of the regime →

The Radar reads these regimes every day. See today's reading →

Characters: Structure (intermarket) · Flow (risk appetite) · Mood · Dollar