Radar Perene / Articles / episode

The two clocks begin to disagree — May 2011

Episode

The extreme

Confidence seemed to have beaten caution. Brazil's appetite for risk firmed up without ambiguity at that month's close, and the investor, at last, stopped paying dearly for shelter. The house's three classic havens loosened together — real estate funds, utilities, and commodities in reais gave back almost all the premium they carried. The money left its burrow. But beneath that optimism, the market's internal structure refused to confirm it: while the aggregate temperature rose, the ratios between sectors still marked a retreat. Two thermometers, two opposite readings — and it was that divorce, not the optimism, that was the real fact of the month. In numbers: the Perene Risk Index jumped from 86.4 to 98.6, while the intermarket closed at 33.37, still below neutrality; the IFIX/IBOV ratio plunged from a z of 2.85 to 0.77 — the single sharpest move of the period.

What happened next

The firmness did not last. Two months on, the same Perene Risk Index that had printed 98.6 had collapsed to 14.8 — by August 2011 it was scrambling to recompose at 69.2, in a month when the devalued real, not the fundamentals, inflated the price of commodities. The disagreement between the thermometers did not dissolve; it deepened. In November 2011, domestic appetite climbed to the highest point of the period (86.0) while the intermarket structure sank to 23.23, in strong reduced risk, with capital fleeing the financial sector. The divorce was only resolved a full year later: in May 2012, the Perene Risk Index capitulated from 78.5 to 18.8, finally crossing into risk_off. The two clocks struck together again — but on the pessimistic side.

What did not happen

May's high tide was no firm ground. Anyone who read the 98.6 as consolidation got the timing wrong: the reading did not hold even two months. And the divergence did not close on the optimistic side — the cautious structure never rose to confirm the appetite. It was the appetite that crashed down to meet the caution. The reconciliation cost a year and a capitulation.

The honest verdict

May's reading captured a real rotation — the shelter premium was indeed draining away. But it mistook firmness for resolution. The signal that mattered was not the high number; it was the disagreement between the two thermometers. And disagreement, in the Radar, rarely announces consolidation: it tends to announce instability.

Continue reading: When the two clocks finally strike together · The imported downgrade of August 2011 · The discord of the 2011 European crisis →

The Radar reads these regimes every day. See today's reading →

Characters: Structure (intermarket) · Flow (risk appetite) · Mood · Dollar