Radar Perene / Archive / article

The commodity climbed to the top. No one bought it.

◦ Written under index methodology v1 (in effect until 15 Jul 2026). The current series is v2 — readings quoted here may differ from those shown today. See the methodology.

Article

The extreme

A line can reach the top of the entire grid without a single hand having bought what it measures. That is what the ratio between commodities priced in reais and the equity index did in the winter the exchange rate filled the coffers: it climbed to the sharpest point of the whole intermarket grid, the kind of reading the eye translates as optimism about the Brazil that exports. Except the ore had gone nowhere. The same commodities measured in dollars barely moved — it was the currency, not the raw material, that did the entire job. The month's report acknowledged it plainly: "the market is not buying raw materials; it is buying currency protection."

In numbers: in November 2024, the Commodities (R$)/IBOV ratio jumped to the most extreme point of the entire row, while the pair measured in dollars, that same month, sat still below its own average. Behind it, a dollar at R$ 5.81, the Selic back to 11.25% a year, and a defensive domestic regime, a score of 27.9. The coffers filled because the currency gave way; the commodity stood still — and the ratio closed the month more than three deviations from its average.

What rhymes

Step back four years, to the shock that set everything racing, and the same line appears at the top — for an almost opposite reason. In March 2020, with the floor vanishing beneath equities, the Commodities/IBOV ratio leapt in a single month from below its own average to an extreme the archive rarely records — the largest jump of the month. This time the panic was real: the market's mood scraped the floor of the scale, the Ânima at 2.6 down from 4.1, and the dollar closed at R$ 4.8839, a statistical anomaly, while the central bank cut the Selic to 3.75% a year. Here the commodity-in-reais did what one expects of a shelter inside a fire: it fell less than everything else, held up by the fleeing currency. No one was buying ore then either — but it was a genuine refuge, the real asset that endures when the rest liquidates.

What didn't happen

In neither month did anyone buy the commodity for the commodity. But the two tops are not the same top. In 2020, the line rose because the denominator was collapsing and capital was running toward what endures; in 2024, there was no collapse at all — the pair in dollars, sitting still below its own average, is proof that the ore did not move. What November lacked was precisely the liquidation that gave the March shelter its meaning. The naive reading — "commodities-in-reais at the top, therefore optimism about the exporter" — held up in neither of the two crossings, but it erred for different reasons in each.

Honest verdict

The same ruler, two incompatible fears. Commodities/IBOV at the top can be a real flight into the asset that endures, as in 2020, or the exchange rate disguised as strength, as in 2024 — and only by separating the pair in reais from the pair in dollars does one find out which. Buying currency protection is not buying the commodity; but in the arithmetic it looks like it, and the line rises the same in both cases. The reading gets it right by pinning the anomaly every time. What it cannot do alone is say whether the top is shelter or artifact — and both times the line rose without anyone buying what it measures.

Continue the story: Every FX shock leaves the same question · The commodity top that was currency →

The Radar reads these regimes every day. See today's reading →

Read also: The exchange rate changes the price of everything. Not the question. · Commodities at the top. The ore, standing still.

Characters: Dollar · Commodities